Misra, who took over as chief justice in August 2017, has yet to comment on the allegations. No observation was made by any of the seven judges with regard to the MoP. The high court at Hyderabad still does not have a full-time Chief Justice. The thing was done, but in a way, that it raises doubt on the integrity of the institution.
Tension has been brewing among the judiciary since November a year ago.
It is an internal matter of the judiciary, the sources in the government said.
Senior counsel and former Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium too was recommended for appointment as judge of the apex court straight from the top court's bar. The court also ordered the release of the activist. The petition argued that Chief Justice Misra should recuse himself from hearing the petition because there was a conflict of interest.
(L-R) Justices Kurian Joseph, Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi and Madan Lokur address the media at a news conference in New Delhi, India January 12, 2018. This move drew widespread criticism, with many legal luminaries claiming the judicial process had been grossly violated.More news: Rookie class powered Saints to playoffs, could make history
Nepal media has reported that Parajuli had instructed a Supreme Court staff to file a contempt case against the activist, who was "critical of the apex court's controversial rulings" affecting medical education sector.
She will be the seventh woman Judge since independence to be a Supreme Court Judge, reports PTI. This issue has been debated between the government and the judiciary since 2015.
"For the survival of a democracy, it is said... the hallmark of a democracy is independent and impartial judges. Family disputes are never taken to the streets", Hegde told the Press Trust of India news agency.
The chief justice was known to assign "politically sensitive cases, which would have far-reaching impact on the republic, to hand-picked judges in order to achieve a particular outcome", Bhushan alleged. Chelameswar said they were not doing this with pleasure and were not "running politics". He also headed the bench that referred the matter on Aadhaar's privacy concerns to a larger Constitution bench. The press conference at his house on Friday is perhaps his most brazen expression of opinion so far. The court will hear the matter on Friday. The next trial judge acquitted Amit Shah and others in the fake encounter case on December 30, 2014. Nikam said, "Today's press conference would cause a bad precedent".
The repercussion of revolt in judiciary was immediately felt in the other two pillars of Indian democracy-the executive and legislature- as Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly met Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to discuss about the press briefing of the four judges.